Molly writes:
"What's the right way to handle playground "rules" set by other people? Sometimes when we're at the playground some other parent will say to their kid "no swinging on your stomach" or "no going down the slide backwards" or "no shouting" or "no jumping in puddles" or some other perplexing rule that I never thought of, and then their kids (no dummies) say "But he's doing it!"--meaning mine.
I totally, totally get how this makes their life difficult but 1) I don't get the rule itself, I never thought of it, and I don't see why it matters and 2) I don't really want to mess with my kid's head by saying, Oh OK, this random adult made a new rule, let's follow it. (I'm not letting him throw dirt or woodchips, I'm not letting him mow down other kids, I'm not letting him hog all the pails & spades or anything that would CLEARLY be rude/dangerous, at least to me. )
What's the social contract say on this? I missed that chapter. Can we have separate playgrounds for the intense parents and us lazy parents?"
You know, I think one of the big challenges of parenting is establishing your own policies and sticking to them in the midst of social pressure from other parents (and society at large). Parents of older kids can probably confirm that this gets more and more difficult as the kids get older. Violent video games, violent movies, Bratz, hoochie clothes for tweener girls--it seems like there are a lot of things that we're going to have to work hard to maintain a stance against.
So think of this time of dealing with other people's rules on the playground as little baby steps of preparation for telling your child that, no, she can't go to Cancun alone with her friends for spring break because they're only 14.
The parents I know have always operated under the assumption that you can make whatever rules you want for your own kids, but you can't make rules for other people's kids (assuming the other kids aren't hurting yours), and that enforcing your rules is your own business. Add you can't resent other people for having their own rules.
So that means that you have a perfect right to bring grapes as a snack for your kids, but you can't get angry at another mom for bringing Oreos. You can let your kid run around with shoes off at the playground, and even if I think it's stupid of you, I can't resent you for doing it, even if it causes me extra trouble to keep my kids in their shoes*. I can casually mention the recent cases of kids who've had their feet burned by the asphalt on the playground, but only to help you out, not to tell you you have to parent the way I do.
And, the other responsibility is being able to explain to your kids that "they do things their way and we do things our way" without saying or implying the words "irresponsible," "lazy," "helicopter," "controlling," or "dumbass."
So, basically, you make the policies for your kids, and other people make the ones for theirs, and you don't have to go by theirs and they don't have to go by yours. The stuff you're dealing with now at the playground is small potatoes compared to the stuff that'll come up later, so use this time as practice for helping your kids separate your family from what "everyone else" is doing and making that process explicit. That way later on they'll be less tempted to jump off the bridge when their friends are.
* A tip for that is to get water shoes and call them the "special playground shoes" and hype them as a cool thing they get to wear instead of that they have to wear. This won't work forever, but it will buy you a summer or three.
Everything Moxie said.
Every family is different and has different rules. And since you are the more lax parent in this scenario, this will be easy for you. But, the time will come when your rule is more strict and you'll be glad the kids have seen this in action before.
Posted by: SarcastiCarrie | August 07, 2008 at 09:49 AM
Yeah this is totally an "If everyone else jumped off the Empire State Building..." situation. When my 5 yr old started calling me on stuff that other kids were allowed (or not allowed) to do, I reminded her that everyone has to listen to what their own mom or dad is telling them to do. "That's ok for her and her mom, but it's not ok for us," whether it's a more or less stringent rule in a given situation.
On the other hand, I am a big stickler for following the posted rules. If the McDonald's play place says "Socks Required," then *socks are required*, and it kind of bugged me the last time I was at one of these that my kids were the only 2 with socks on. Even though it was posted in 3 different places with a note that socks were available at the counter for $1 a pair.
I made a big deal to my kids that if there are rules posted, we are not at liberty to ignore them. It's not my rule, though personally I think it's a good idea to wear socks anyway, but if the rule is X, we do X. Regardless of what other parents and kids are doing. Same for rules that are mine.
And I think kids are able to get that pretty young.
(Am I making any sense? I'm operating on not much sleep.. got a 16 month old who needs to be held all night long for some reason and I'm 8.5 months pregnant and no position is comfortable anyway...)
Posted by: MorahLaura | August 07, 2008 at 09:53 AM
Interesting. I would have never thought of "enforcing" my own laxness.
If my daughter is pointed out as being an example of breaking someone else's rules, I'll usually have her comply with the other family's rules, because, really, what's 10 minutes of less dirt/less sliding head first on your stomache, etc. And point out that she's being "an example" to the other kid.
However, she does need to follow *my* rules - which tend to be more safety oriented than dirt oriented. Watch out for the swings. Keep your shoes on (I don't care if she took hers off, yours need to stay on. Ugh. Flip Flops at the playground are the worst - they seem dangerous to run around in AND taking them off is not good either. Crocs are only nominally better because they get all kinds of mulch in them and have some sort of semi-legitimate need to get dumped out every once in a while.)
Posted by: Cathy | August 07, 2008 at 10:13 AM
Good advice Moxie. Ditto!
Posted by: Aaron | August 07, 2008 at 10:18 AM
I think that kids get pretty good at understanding differing sets of rules. (At least I really really hope so!) In addition to the different rules for different kids/families in regards to public places like playgrounds, I think kids can pick up on different rules for different places (quiet in the library, while you can be loud on the playground).
Also, we as parents also need to consider the different rules of someone's private space as well as posted rules of places. So if my child is in someone else's house and they don't do X in their house, that must apply to my child and not just their children. I have a feeling this isn't always going to be easy to teach... is it, wiser parents who have been through it?
A final thought is also that different people have different rules for the same place. For example, if my mom babysitting and giving my child dinner, she does not like messes, so she will still spoon feed her. I don't care if my child plays with her food and smears it in her face and hair. But when Nana is feeding her, Nana holds the spoon. And she doesn't seem to fuss about it, whereas if I try to hold the spoon she freaks out.
I have no idea how to teach these things at this point. I am hoping it comes naturally. (Let me have this one, okay? I'm running on very little sleep overall. What is with the 16-17 month sleep regression???)
Posted by: caramama | August 07, 2008 at 10:30 AM
Interesting. Even with my 15 month old, I've felt some of this. I sometimes let her walk/run at the grocery store because I think she's so good and having so much fun, but I can feel the dismay from other parents who have their kids sitting in their carts, behaving so well.
Posted by: Sherry | August 07, 2008 at 10:34 AM
This gets a little worse if the other family in question is actually related to you or such close friends that you are together at a beach house or camping. I find that one SIL takes our different rules as implied criticism of her, while the others are very live and let live about it.
Posted by: laura | August 07, 2008 at 10:37 AM
By the time my kid was three, I had repeated "different families have different rules about that" so many times that she could come up with it as an explanation on her own. That two-year-old has a pacifier at nursery school, and you can only have yours in bed? "I guess Bridget's family has a different rule about pacis." Sarah has her shoes off at the playground? "Her family doesn't have that rule, but we do."
When my kid tries to enforce our family's rules (or her own sense of propriety) on other kids, I remind her: "You don't make rules for him - his mom does." I have zero interest in getting other people's kids to follow our rules for the sake of "fairness." Although I will step in if a kid is doing something that endangers others.
Posted by: Rivka | August 07, 2008 at 10:38 AM
I will sometimes use the moment to praise the children who have stricter rules. "I let you and your brother go head first on the slide, but since this little boy's mama told him he wasn't allowed to do it, he's following her directions. He might want to copy you, but he's being a good listener instead."
This is a way to appease the possibly annoyed strict mom and explain the rules to your own.
Posted by: Jill in Atlanta | August 07, 2008 at 10:41 AM
Can I say that I actually really resent it when people "casually" mention things just to help me out. I'm one of those people who hate being offered help unless I ask for it and the casual mentioning of things is one of those post-baby things I've been introduced to which happens all the time. I KNOW that people mean well. But the fact is that I'm actually very-well educated about parenting things, I've just chosen to take a laxer approach. My husband and I call it caveman parenting (if baby is fed and warm and no tigers have eaten him, we are doing just fine). The casual mention may feel like it's helpful but it reads like either (a) we are stupid because we don't know anything or (b) we are bad parents because we know the risks but we let junior do such-and-such anyways. On top of which, so much stuff which is casually mentioned is just plain wrong! Most people are not Moxie's. Okay. Done with the vent.
Posted by: Jac | August 07, 2008 at 10:47 AM
I agree and I get that rules can vary between families without anyone being a bad parent, but what do you do when someone else's kid isn't being abusive or mean, but just a general pain in the neck that is ruining everyone else's fun? The kid who insists on climbing up the slide even though three kids are at the top waiting to come down, or the one who never waits his turn but just barges in front, or the big kid who delights in taking up all the space on the playset meant for little kids so that the little kids don't feel safe or welcome there (and can't use the one for big kids because it's not safe for them...).
This is the situation I most commonly run into at playgrounds, and I tell you, it drives me nuts. I make sure Frances follows the rules regardless (just because he cut you off doesn't mean you can cut her off, but yes, it was rude), but at what point are you entitled to step in and get that other kid to bugger off?
I'll admit I normally end up saying something. "Excuse me, but my daughter would like to go down that slide, maybe you could give her a turn." Normally they listen--while their parents sit on the bench, watching--and I end up feeling like a bitchy, interfering mother.
Posted by: Andrea | August 07, 2008 at 10:47 AM
I probably fall on the side of the more strict parent, and will take this opportunity to share my response to a man who was clearly annoyed by me not letting my child go head-first down a slide and who decided that it was a good idea to call me out: Once you've held your panicked, screaming, writhing child down so that the ER doctor can stitch up his eyelid, the fun of doing things headfirst is pretty effectively ruined.
"Just because it's okay for him/her doesn't make it okay for you," is an oft-repeated phrase, and I don't expect to stop saying that any time soon.
Posted by: wix | August 07, 2008 at 10:57 AM
What Jill in Atlanta said. Must be the name!
Posted by: Jill | August 07, 2008 at 11:02 AM
Really, it's ok for a kid to climb up a slide, when other kids are trying to come down? I think parents who allow things like that let their kid disrupt every one else's play. I think it's alright to ask your child to sacrifice some of their fun for the sake of the group once in a while.
Posted by: Badger | August 07, 2008 at 11:03 AM
@Andrea - I think asking the other kid politely is fine.
There are times when there is a kid lying on a slide or climbing up it or otherwise not using playground equipment for it's intended purpose. Stepping in and speaking up for your child - modeling how to ask for what she would like and most people would find to be reasonable is what you're supposed to do.
"Amelia would like to take a turn on the tire swing when you're done" or "Jane would like to go down the slide. Can she take a turn?" is what you would have your child say when you want her to speak up for herself as she gets bigger. And, for the most part, the kids will comply if you give them a minute.
I also think it's OK that the parents are sitting on a bench (or chasing the younger sib) - the kids are usually elementary school aged and this is their chance to learn about the world and getting along with people too.
Posted by: Cathy | August 07, 2008 at 11:03 AM
I like what Cathy said!
Posted by: Badger | August 07, 2008 at 11:09 AM
It struck me that this isn't really only about "behavior," as such. There are other rules that will always be different. If your kid can't have peanut butter. Or no ice cream before dinner. Or "we don't eat shrimp."
When I think back on these rules in my own childhood, two things seemed to come out. First was the topic we're discussing - that of "I want to do that and you wont let me."
The second is the one that layers on more heavily as we get older - that of "But I want to be like everyone else."
My family tried to raise me as "different and proud of it" and that didn't really help a lot when I was 10, wishing for real keds and the freedom to go to the mall with friends. Maybe it would help mitigate that feeling of seperation to highlight those other children in the same boat? I haven't tried it - but "You need to wear shoes - and look Jenny has shoes too. And Jack."
Maybe then, at 14, they'll accept that they can go to the waterpark with the other kids, instead of cancun.
Posted by: Lily | August 07, 2008 at 11:30 AM
I'm kind of the "uptight" parent at the playground... I definitely don't expect your kids to adhere to the rules I have for my boys. I know they sometimes will look at kids that are a little less (having a hard time coming up with a good word here - best I can do is controlled) and their eyes get kind of wide and they just watch and watch the other kid(s) doing whatever they aren't permitted to do. We've been fortunate that many times the other kids have been (or at least appeared because my boys run on the smaller side for their age) older so I think my boys see it as the older kids being able to do something they can't.
Posted by: mo | August 07, 2008 at 11:44 AM
Like Lily, I think this is all part of a larger conversation with your kids about differences. Like, "Look at that fat guy, mommy!" and how I try to squash my urge to shush her and say instead, "People come in all shapes and sizes, isn't that interesting?" which is sort of the equivalent of "They have different rules than we do."
Modeling that behavior wasn't easy last time we saw a naked guy rollerblading down Castro Street in San Francisco :)
Posted by: JB | August 07, 2008 at 11:51 AM
Wait, people have rules for their kids on the playground? You mean not every playground is a hellish, Hobbesian, Lord-of-the-Flies-esque free-for-all where children snatch other kids' toys and someone like my husband is frozen out by the mom clique for reprimanding a kid who (unchastised by his parent/grownup) threw sand at our then-six-month-old's head?
I have got to get out of the city more often. ;-)
Posted by: electriclady | August 07, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Wow, we have some very deferential people here -- I don't ask if another child can have a turn, I tell, and it doesn't have to be my kid who's being pushed out of the way, either.
Other stuff is just different-families-have-different-rules, but acting as though you have dibs on public property? Nuh-uh.
Posted by: Slim | August 07, 2008 at 11:55 AM
IMHO, it is okay for a child to climb up the slide if they have asked for a turn to do so and the other children have assigned a slot in which to do so. And they seem to be okay with that as long as *their* place in line is respected, too. Rules of decorum and turn-taking respected allows a lot more leeway for 'using the equipment in an unusual way'.
Granted, most slide climbing my kids do is at home. Their sensory issues make sliding down uncomfortable sometimes, but climbing up just lights up their little brains like fireworks. We currently have the rope swing placed in such a way that they can hold onto it while sliding down (hand-over-hand, kinda), which makes the 'world flying at you' thing much more comfy for two of them.
Anyway.
I'm with the 'Our family, our rules, their family their rules' and 'our house, our rules, their house, their rules'.
My kids often do things that aren't in other people's list of safe things, because I know they are already accomplished at them. And since we are prone to a lot of autonomous activity (Montessori-style), people may be alarmed by this at times, but mainly they're just astonished and then get over it. Astonished can come out badly, though. As long as I am clear about respecting other people's rules, that's been fine.
But one wrinkle in this is the issue of modeling with older/younger kids. A few months ago, our town was having weekly free concerts, and we'd all walk down and listen and race about on the grass and through the little wooded area to the side. My older two (followed by the younger two) would race off around the grounds, including a path behind some shrubs under the trees, near the fence that separates the grounds from a building under construction. Once they run off that way, the 2 - 4 year olds in the crowd would follow. I allow my kids to go back along the path, they're tall enough I can see them over the bushes, etc. (and I know they are watching their sisters, though I'm not 'counting' on that.) I'm willing to watch my kids explore that area. What I'm not comfortable with is that the younger kids will model off that behavior, and follow suit, which creates problems for the other families, especially if their kids are small enough that their heads don't show over the top of the bushes.
The same with climbing trees - my kids will do it one one of the medium trees (or even very carefully up the midline of a smaller tree), and then 6 seconds later, one of the small trees will be engulfed by a bunch of preschoolers trying to copy the cool older kids (okay, so they're nearly the ONLY older kids there, most days!). And then parents will be hauling their kids away from the poor trees being bent over, and... :wince:
So, we have had discussions about social awareness, and the fact that if someone else saw you do it, they now have it in their head. Even if they don't do it HERE, they may think it is okay to do somewhere else, and that is NOT necessarily okay. Social responsibility means being attuned to how our actions affect others, what choices we model as good, and to whom. Yes, the other parents can say 'our rules don't allow this' - but we also do not live in a vacuum, but in a community.
So, we ask them to restrain some of the risk-taking behaviors in group settings, but allow them in more solitary conditions, where the modeling issue isn't present, or in limited situations where we can responsibly communicate with the other parties about risk and comfort level. We recognize that we are asking our kids to refrain from doing things they are able to do (physically), safely, but because of our need to respect others in the community, as well as apply 'safe' to the others in our community, and to be kind to the other families present, we refrain. It is a choice we make, even though pure unfettered freedom of the 'our rules/their rules' application would allow our kids do whatever they choose.
Being honest about the reasons - I really do worry about the poor little trees with the preschoolers climbing all over them (they're so small the kids wouldn't get hurt, but the trees are likely to get damaged), and I worry about the other kids following a model 6 years older than themselves from memory somewhere else - provides the information my kids need about why I ask them to choose a different activity level. Being honest about the concern has also allowed us to talk out what exactly the range of 'modeling risk' should be - say, swinging belly down is something they think the other parents can handle with their kids, but understanding that running behind bushes tall enough that preschoolers can't be seen (and yet older kids can be) is beyond the preschooler's mental powers *and* is significanly problematic for the parents, safety, etc. Climbing trees under certain conditions might be fine, but under those I described it wasn't really. Each situation has to be watched, and being the leader also means that one may need to attend to who's following and whether that's a good idea. Might not be your problem to solve, but awareness is important.
So, a bit more complicated with the older kids.
BTW, while it isn't comfortable, I'm okay with a stranger asking my child to tone it down because their child is modeling off my child. I typically will not do this myself, but I understand that it is one social strategy of many, and variety is acceptable. So far, this has not really been much of a problem - especially since we've already addressed with them why another parent might be concerned, and I have seen G notice the repercussions and shift his behavior (maybe not as far as the other family might prefer, but it does tend to eliminate the disgruntlement reaction).
Far more often, my kids will point out other kids to me and say, 'that kid doesn't understand how to treat the equipment respectfully' or 'that kid isn't being safe' - and we say pretty much what is said by Moxie - their parents set their rules, we set ours. Sometimes we'll get push-back, from the kids - "BUT MOM, that's not SAFE..." especially if there are posted rules, or when it is at a public garden or museum, because our kids have a deep love of these places. It's a judgment call whether to do the little 'there's a rules list posted over there' nudge, or quietly bring it to the attention of a staffperson. I don't recall being in a situation where anyone needed to do more, unless it was my kid involved (the climing thing, OY, and seriously, THANK YOU to the parents who have sent up the flares when child X was being unsafe while I was distracted with child Y).
Oy, long, and no more time to edit... sigh.
Posted by: hedra | August 07, 2008 at 11:55 AM
Great advice, Moxie!
The funniest part of the whole thing for me is how incredibly hard it is not to sound judgmental with all of these choices.
I thought it was funny because it was so built right into Molly's question. My toddler loves nothing as much as he loves to throw dirt and wood chips! And unless he's being aggressive towards another child, I let him fling dirt to his heart's content.
Do I feel kind of badly if another child sees his joy and decides to join in the filthy fun? Yeah. But I figure that their parent can either tell them to stop, or let them continue.
Posted by: Liza | August 07, 2008 at 12:02 PM
I'm with Cathy on the modeling how to respond, when it is appropriate - though mainly my kids already do that on their own - I can't recall the last time I had to do that as a model, except with each other (they'll push each other, but almost never get out of line with strangers).
Posted by: hedra | August 07, 2008 at 12:03 PM
I'll often model to my kids when they are discussing this issue with friends, "our family rule is that you can ride your bike in the parking lot if the gate is closed, but not when it its open". So I'll hear my kids saying to others , "Oh, our family rule is that you have to leave your shoes on at the playground". And they are totally okay with that.
But, that being said, I guess I'm going to go against what many of the commenters have said already to say that I really don't believe in interfering with a child's play unless there is something dangerous going on. I try to let them work it out for themselves, keeping an eye on them of course. I don't really think there's anything wrong with climbing up a slide. There's no rule that says playground equipment can only be used in a certain way. In fact, the best playgrounds are those that allow the child to play in many ways and be creative. I teach my kids to be safe and courteous but I just can't bring myself to stand there, forcing them to play in a certain way that I've decided is "correct". Let me reiterate that I will intervene if they are not being safe or courteous. If they are waiting a turn, I'm not going to intervene myself, but I might say, "why don't you ask that girl if you can go next?".
Posted by: regiemino | August 07, 2008 at 12:13 PM
Oh no, the dread "the slide is only for going down" rule. I have gotten soooo much flak for this; before I had a child I would never have believed it.
Who knew that a piece of plastic only works in one direction? Not me. Not going to enforce other people's sense of direction. Sorry. They will have to work it out with their kids on their own.
I can see some of Hedra's examples and try to be aware of that but I cannot really try to run the world.
By the same token they can have any rules they like for their own kids.
Taking turns is different though - taking turns is about access to public stuff and I will gladly help in modelling how to do that. I like the "X would like a turn as soon as you are finished" phrase.
Posted by: Shandra | August 07, 2008 at 12:19 PM
What Jac said. Oh my, oh my how I hate it when people mention things casually to me. I really think the default should be to stay out of other people's business especially when it comes to kids.
If some other kid is being a real PITA, then I take my kid somewhere else. If the other parent wants to encourage sharing, cool, but not me.
I agree that kids can understand that they have their own rules. I just explain things by saying casually/regally, "We [Lastnames] don't do that." It works okay.
Posted by: liphovela | August 07, 2008 at 12:19 PM
So much of what I say, if anything, and when, if ever, depends on the age of the children (and other factors). I pretty much expect school-age children to stand up for themselves; I think it's cruel to let a toddler be pushed out of the way when s/he doesn't have the skills to stand up for her/himself appropriately. I will also intervene if I think there's a language barrier that is keeping a kid from saying, "Excuse me, but it's my turn."
What I'm looking for is the greatest good for the greatest number. Intervening for kids who can't stand up for themselves yet, teaching kids how to stand up for themselves, and letting kids handle things themselves seems to me to be the best way to do that.
Posted by: Slim | August 07, 2008 at 12:22 PM
"Oh no, the dread "the slide is only for going down" rule. I have gotten soooo much flak for this; before I had a child I would never have believed it.
Who knew that a piece of plastic only works in one direction? Not me. Not going to enforce other people's sense of direction. Sorry. They will have to work it out with their kids on their own."
Oh no, the dreaded "We are free spirits being oppressed by you sticks-in-the-mud" people? Who knew that your child was allowed to monopolize a piece of equipment to prove his creativity and free-spiritedness while a group of children wait at the top for him to finish up so they can slide down?
Like a slide, it works both ways. What's going to get the greatest good for the greatest number?
And FWIW, I don't care what my kids do on playground equipment as long as it's not dangerous and it's not inconveniencing other people. (We do "safe, respectful, and fair.")
Posted by: Slim | August 07, 2008 at 12:28 PM
@Shandra, our responsibility ends where our effectiveness ends - cannot run the world. But are willing to make effective and prudent choices provided they are also true to ourselves.
I think mainly my examples come in when the kids are well into school and the age range is mixed (both). If they're all school age, they can handle it together, themselves. If there is a steady spread of range, also, kids tend to model more off the kids closer to their age, so the 'step-up' is within range of ability. It's when there's a big gap between ages that the social responsibility comes in. (Having thought that through more after writing it - what situations DOES this come up in? Mainly when it is 2, 3, 4 year olds trying to copy a 10 year old.) Maybe because so many people have just two kids relatively close together in age, we often end up at events that either have ONLY older kids (and our youngers are the only young ones) or ONLY younger kids (and our olders are the only older ones). Age gap in our kids also plays a role (7 years between first and last.)
So maybe the advice I have is not going to be relevant for most people, really - because for most it is age-peers (their rules/our rules), or close steps up or down (modeling off closer ability levels).
Posted by: hedra | August 07, 2008 at 12:35 PM
But Slim...
a) the rule "the slide is only for going down" is not related to how many kids are on it. That would be "don't hog the slide."
b) just because one child takes longer than the rest doesn't mean his or her turn is somehow less legitimate. It's not true for the swings or anything else; why slides?
I don't let my son stand on the slide for 4 minutes while a backlog of kids get at the top, but I've had parents inform me "the slide is for going down" after my son climbed it... while no one was around.
Posted by: Shandra | August 07, 2008 at 12:36 PM
My motto is "just because you *can* doesn't mean you *should*". I'll have my boys do what are our rules, but beyond that all's fair in war (they're boys, it's always war). Just because the other kid *can* do that, doesn't mean my kid *should*.
Posted by: Kelly | August 07, 2008 at 12:48 PM
So many people have brought up good points. I like what Moxie said, and I think the idea of "every family is different" is something that is easier to enforce rules-wise if introduced from the get-go. For example, I remember when my first son (who was HUGE) was about 2 years old and we were having lunch at a restaurant with friends. Their little girl was a little peanut of a thing. Her booster was really tippy so the only safe, logistical way for her to eat in the booth was to stand. Now, mind you, she was REALLY good--not fidgety or anything, and even standing, was only then the perfect "ergonominal" height. My boy, on the other hand, wanted to stand, which was a big no-no for us (because right after standing, where the table comes up to his thighs) comes the temptation to put a knee on the table, followed by a foot, maybe some dancing...you get the picture. So for them, they weren't breaking a rule--it was problem solving. I know it's not the same thing, but it started the pattern that every family is different based on lots of different things.
As for the playground, I agree with MorahLaura on the posted rules thing...this translates right into the discussion about speed limits and such. But as for the other rules, I tend to be a little more lax on the playground, but have worked my son into the "depends on who's there" thing. If he's the only one, then for sure I let him climb up the slide. (I know, call CPS.) When others are there, he knows not to (or I can remind him) that he can't because others might want to actually use the slide for its intended purpose. He's pretty good at the EQ thing, so he gets how to scale it back a little. Other moms bring juice boxes while I bring water? No biggie...it's not any different from when I say apple dippers at McD instead of fries. I think it's important not to cower in your own parenting. This applies mostly to public/shared space places. If you're on someone's property or at their house, I think laxness gets trumped by house rules. (If I know a friend doesn't allow climbing up the slide, we don't do it there--period.)
I think what's tricky is that we're told in parenting that consistency is often the key to success. Yet, I know it sounds like what I'm saying here is that it's OK to be all over the board. But really what I mean is, gauge your kids, communicate, and use common sense.
@Jill in Atlanta--I love your idea of using other kids' rule-following as an example of good behavior! I'm going to have to try that...
Posted by: Simone | August 07, 2008 at 12:50 PM
I don't have a child who is really playground ready yet (as she is only 7 months!), but I really appreciate this conversation. I love to come to this site to read about many things, but most especially the ways in which other parents craft their interactions with and around their children for the purpose of imparting important skills, lessons, ideas, etc.
As much as I learn from these threads, however, I will say that there is a part of me that always feel like we, today's parents of young children, make our lives a lot harder than we have to. That part of me is wringing her hands after reading this discussion - how can we possibly take things like the *playground* this deadly seriously? Fortuantely, I know that it's not the playground politics that's a serious issue, but the things we teach our kids when we choose the ways in which we interact with each other at the playground. So the rest of me really loves this discussion.
A useless comment, I realize. :-)
Posted by: Jo | August 07, 2008 at 12:51 PM
@Slim and Shandra, I think it has more to do with the negotiated turn - the kids on the steps have one set of expectations about whose turn is next, compared to the child climbing up. Most kids don't care how long the turn is, provided they know whose turn it is, and understand when it will be over so the next one can go.
I can remember when I was learning to climb the slide, and my sister would go up the ladder but announce that my turn was just before hers - it seemed a brilliant solution to my child mind - she could 'hold the space' for me while I climbed up, and then would slide down with me (I disliked going down alone), and everyone could kind of tell how long the turn for each would be. I can remember actually getting a lot of cheering on from the kids waiting because they knew what the pattern was - that girl climbs up, they both go down, the faster she climbs up, the sooner our turn comes! WOO! Climb! Climb! (I have a vague recollection of my mom spotting me for safety as I climbed, so I wonder if that whole scenario was orchestrated...)
And yes, some kids were still a little grumpy, but only until I got fast at climbing the slide. They were also grumpy at the kids who held onto the sides to slow them down or who stopped at the bottom and didn't get off right away, etc. I can also recall being swung off the slide if I was taking too long (again likely my mom), and starting again when my sister was at the top of the slide again.
Many solutions, most likely.
Posted by: hedra | August 07, 2008 at 12:52 PM
First, when I do recite rules to my kids at the playground, I always add a "because" at the end of the rule. That way it helps MY child to understand why I am making that rule and if there is another parent or another child around that cannot possibly understand the reason for my rule, then they can also hear my rationale.
They, of course, do not need to enforce the same rule, but maybe there is a danger or issue they aren't aware of and my explanation will make them more aware. Or if they think my rule is dumb, then at least they'll have my dumb explanation for that rule!
And....I'm with Slim on the slide issue. My son is free to climb the slide, as long as there isn't a line of people waiting to go down. My daughter is welcome to sit at the bottom of the slide, as long as there aren't people waiting to go down. If others are waiting, we take turns.
Posted by: Annie | August 07, 2008 at 12:54 PM
Ug, not clear - my sister would announce the 'turn space held for climbing sister' as soon as her foot was on the ladder - not after she got to the top. SO the kids following knew what to expect.
Posted by: hedra | August 07, 2008 at 12:56 PM
I'm sorry that my trying-to-be-funny tone came off kind of bratty, folks..I see it now and am a bit embarrassed...
Just as my kid is learning a ton of new social rules at the playground...so am I.
When another parent at the playground says "we don't push the trucks down the stairs", I'm not actually thinking that he/she is controlling or anything bad. I kind of feel like I'm in a foreign country and don't know how to act.
I am trying to be friendly and neighborly with the other parents. I don't want to be shunned at the playground (I mean, I don't think I am that permissive, or that my kid is a terror, but who ever does?) or unknowingly let the kid do something that is dangerous, so I appreciate the suggestions of things to do/say to smooth it over and acknowledge it.
Posted by: molly | August 07, 2008 at 01:06 PM
I have a different opinion that @Cathy.
We have a pre-schooler, and I think it is really important for DH and I to NOT step in and speak for our daughter. When she has minor playground conflicts, I try hard to listen to her and then help her strategize how to resolve the problem herself.
I do step in for major safety issues, which happen once in a while. And although I can't remember this ever happening, I do imagine I would step in if I saw that DD was having a really hard time/looking very upset or traumatized.
But I have a whole thing about trying to teach independance and confidence in girls (in particular, but a lot of this applies to boys too) and I can't stand it when I see parents swooping in and doing every little thing FOR their kid to "protect" or "stand up for" their kids. I think it is a confidence drain.
Posted by: Michelle | August 07, 2008 at 01:11 PM
@molly - I wouldn't worry about being shunned. Despite my heathen slide attitude I still get along ok at the playground. :)
To me a lot of the "rules" people try to impose are a symptom of
a) discomfort with physical play and the outdoors and risks of exploration. I'm perfectly ok with parents making those decisions for their own kids, but not for mine.
and b) a symptom of what happens when (as is natural) our worlds shrink during early childhood... small things take on bigger significance, particularly since the playground is the parent equivalent of a stage - everyone can see what I'm doing, if my child is rude, etc. It's tough that way.
But darned if I'm going to insist the slide is for going down. It's not. Many of our local ones have toe holds. And I have a playground engineer in the family who spends much time ensuring his slides work in both directions. :)
I can't wait until my son's old enough to go to the playground his own and work it out himself.
Posted by: Shandra | August 07, 2008 at 01:23 PM
Oh, Michelle. I would really rather not say it too.
Once La says that she wants to go on (let's say) the tire swing (that poor slide is getting a lot of flak), but there's been a kid swinging away for quite a while on it with no signs of slowing down. We end up going down quite a path before I end up saying something, including waiting a few minutes to see if he (or she) will wrap it up anytime soon. Then telling La that she can let the swing-rider know that she would like a turn. We usually do some back and forth of, "you say it." "No, you say it. You can do it." And then I let the person know that there is a line for the swing or could La swing with him/her?
I think that La does well enough with speaking up for herself while at school - but OTOH, the people at school are not strangers.
Is there a way of encouraging kids to speak up (to kid strangers at the playground) without the consequence of "Well, then I guess you're not going to be able to ride the tire swing until that kid's done."
Posted by: Cathy | August 07, 2008 at 01:24 PM
my take on a few things mentioned:
we've got some 'it depends' rules: up the slide, or headfirst on your belly (on small ones) is OK *IF* there are no little kids around, while modeling something like that in front of babies/toddlers is just plain dangerous - even the 6 YO usually got that, (and sib was the toddler in question one whole summer, so it was only OK if he was in a baby swing at the time).
turns up OR down the slide make sense, but no climbing up and disrupting the line to get down the steps, *slide* back down and be done.
'house rules' are the only way to go: MIL is local, and has the kids 2x/week. Her house, her rules, unless I'm there and think the kids are being dangerous; Mommy trumps for calling kids on misbehavior anyway (usually not within the rules, but sometimes I don't care).
Posted playspace signs are like that - socks, shoes, whatever; if someone owns the playspace, they can make rules. Which makes it easier with playdates at my house - kid visiting is informed of house rules and expected to comply. I once had to confiscate nail clippers from a 7 YO. ??? (His mom was horrified that I had needed to.)
Then again, I confiscated a tennis ball from a kid at school who hit me - while I was holding an infant no less - because 6YOs often can't aim (two of them were playing catch through me). 'But it's mine' only got 'so I'll give it to the grownup taking you home'. All I said was here, and explained that I didn't want to get hit again - neither kid had even thought to apologize.
Posted by: LC | August 07, 2008 at 01:41 PM
You all are making ME want to go down and climb up the slides. I'll have to take the Pumpkin to a playground on our walk today!!!
Posted by: caramama | August 07, 2008 at 03:10 PM
The playgrounds we frequent usually have very hands-off parents. They sit on the benches while their kids play. I see nothing wrong with that (although the parents on the cell phone while their toddler is dangling from space rankle me to no end).
My DH and I generally play with our toddler on the playground, because he's not entirely steady on everything (plus, it's fun). I won't generally speak to someone else's child, unless he/she is hurting my kid or really being obnoxious. A group of older kids commandeered the play area and told my son he couldn't play there. At that point I said, "Oh, yes, he can." Their parents were nowhere around, and my little guy doesn't have the skills yet to stand up to something like that.
Climb up the slide, slide down on your belly, hang from stuff...you name it. It's all fine with me. We spot him where we need to, and don't allow him to hog stuff if others are waiting, but he's been known to pile up woodchips on the slide when no one else is using it, let his cars go down the slide, etc.
I'm there to make sure he's safe, having fun, and not impinging on anyone else's fun. I expect other parents to do the same, although that doesn't always happen.
Posted by: meggiemoo | August 07, 2008 at 03:26 PM
@Cathy-
Hmmm- I don't know. It may sound harsh, but I'm not too worried about it if my kid doesn't ultimately get the tire swing. I figure, sometimes you don't get what you want...but it is still worthwhile to express what you want.
It is true that sometimes (fairly regularly) kids will ignore my daughter when she tries to communicate. On my better days, I'll say to her, "well- this is a public park and you can't FORCE someone to get off the tire. If that kid doesn't know how to share...you can try to ask a different way, but if it doesn't work you will need to decide what else to play with. But it was still good to use your words instead of throwing a fit." And then maybe I'll offer to chase her around the goal posts.
On my tired-and-far-from-ideal days I say "work it out. I am sitting here on the bench."
:)
Posted by: michelle | August 07, 2008 at 03:30 PM
@Slim: You go, girl. I wish there were more parens like you.
The peer pressure I find difficult to deal with is more the kind that expects kids to me more mature than they are, or do things they are not yet ready to do. Two examples:
1. Sharing. My boy is 2. From what I have read/heard, that is too young to learn to properly share. He has lots of trouble keeping his hands to himself (read: not snatching what he wants, when he wants it) and so I am working with him on asking when he wants a toy another kid has. But my rule, for a 2yo, is that if the other kid says "no," then we have to wait until they're done. (Talking about trucks/pails/shovels here, not big playground equip.) Enter another parent, who doesn't get that they are too young to share (and, it seems, most don't). They insist to their child that they share the toy. So now I feel obliged to tell my child to share the toy, too, even though I think this is not appropriate and makes me involved in something that I think the kids should be handling themselves.
2. Saying goodbye/hugging/kissing.
Not necessarily playground etiquette, but similar concept. When a friend's mom tells him to say goodbye, give us a hug/kiss, etc, I feel pressured to tell my boy to do the same, even though I do not like the concept. He sees us show our friends affetion the way we feel comfortable, and I want him to find his own comfortable too, not be forced to kiss his friend's mommy.
Does that make sense? The bottom line here is that I feel pressure to do something that I consider inappropriate, in the name of social niceness.
Posted by: Cate | August 07, 2008 at 03:41 PM
People should keep their mouths shut as long as the kid isn't doing anything obviously dangerous/rude etc to themselves or others.
Even the side comment about shoes and asphalt would really piss me off. Because if the kid is running around s/he's obviously not in pain. Actually I have a neighbor that does this- I have no issue letting my daughter run down the hall to the sitter in warm weather inside my building without shoes. Every single goddam time my neighbor sees her, she mentions something like "oh, no shoes again!" or "where are your shoes, your feet must be cold!" it's &^*%^&#ing IRRITATING because there's definite snippiness, judgement and self-righteousness behind it. My daugher is just fine thank you.
(For the record I only let my daughter run around a playground once shoe-less because it was lightly raining and she was wearing flip flops. It was safer barefoot and I dare anyone to challenge that.)
Posted by: jessica | August 07, 2008 at 03:43 PM
It is funny but this is actually not a problem for us at all. I have never thought twice about pointing out my personal boundaries to a child or an adult or helping my toddler/preschooler do the same when he has not been able to do it for himself. I have no problems asking someone to please stop throwing sand at me (one-year-old) or please take their full-contact football game to away from the small children’s sandbox (10-12-year-olds) or please prevent their dog from defecating in the sandbox (60-year-old) – just to take some recent examples.
I totally go to the playground for the socialization part and my son still needs lots of coaching in the sharing-turn taking-department. The “rules” we have regarding the playground equipment depend on so many things, like weather, how many kids are there, how much time we have to spend there, how tired my son is (when he is tired his sense of balance goes out the window). Adding being respectful to other families’ reasonable rules does not seem like a far stretch for me, but it has not actually come up. We go there partly so that we can interact and get to know other people and learn to get along with them (except for those early morning trips when we OWN the playground!). If we don’t like the arrangement at some point we can always remove ourselves and come back another time.
Posted by: Thy | August 07, 2008 at 03:44 PM
@Slim: You go, girl. I wish there were more parens like you.
The peer pressure I find difficult to deal with is more the kind that expects kids to me more mature than they are, or do things they are not yet ready to do. Two examples:
1. Sharing. My boy is 2. From what I have read/heard, that is too young to learn to properly share. He has lots of trouble keeping his hands to himself (read: not snatching what he wants, when he wants it) and so I am working with him on asking when he wants a toy another kid has. But my rule, for a 2yo, is that if the other kid says "no," then we have to wait until they're done. (Talking about trucks/pails/shovels here, not big playground equip.) Enter another parent, who doesn't get that they are too young to share (and, it seems, most don't). They insist to their child that they share the toy. So now I feel obliged to tell my child to share the toy, too, even though I think this is not appropriate and makes me involved in something that I think the kids should be handling themselves.
2. Saying goodbye/hugging/kissing.
Not necessarily playground etiquette, but similar concept. When a friend's mom tells him to say goodbye, give us a hug/kiss, etc, I feel pressured to tell my boy to do the same, even though I do not like the concept. He sees us show our friends affetion the way we feel comfortable, and I want him to find his own comfortable too, not be forced to kiss his friend's mommy.
Does that make sense? The bottom line here is that I feel pressure to do something that I consider inappropriate, in the name of social niceness.
Posted by: Cate | August 07, 2008 at 03:46 PM
Cate, I agree that kids that age can't "Share." When my daughter was a toddler, her daycare teachers never used the "S" word. Instead they taught the kids to take turns. They would say something like "Sammy is using that now. You can have the next turn. Sammy, let's sing Row, Row, Row and then your turn will be done."
Obviously, it is harder to enforce that on someone else's child when you aren't the teacher, but it might work for times your child has a toy someone else wants, and the other parents might pick it up, too. It worked really well for us. By the end of the year, these 1 to 2 year olds could be heard defending toys from swipes by saying "Using that!" (as opposed to "Mine!").
Posted by: Madeleine | August 07, 2008 at 04:02 PM